sikkinixx
Mar 20, 03:19 PM
Well there wont be any more 20gb PS3's once stores have got rid of stock so it will be $120 difference - but then your getting wifi too.
And Blu-Ray for Casino Royale (did I mention that movie kicks some ass in HD?)
And Blu-Ray for Casino Royale (did I mention that movie kicks some ass in HD?)
iSaint
Apr 25, 08:21 PM
It's no joke. (http://ethnicoffice.utah.gov/about_us/directors.html)
O.M.F.G.!!!
O.M.F.G.!!!
Sun Baked
Sep 4, 06:29 PM
Any ground rules?
No flaming ...
No trolling ...
No name calling ...
etc.
No flaming ...
No trolling ...
No name calling ...
etc.
Dreadnought
Aug 5, 11:55 AM
When you set up folding, you can always set the cpu to use only 50% of its power (or whatever %). Then it shouldn't get that hot, and won't be a windtunnel!
OnceUGoMac
Mar 30, 04:01 PM
I took a survey after buying a few UMD films, and one of the questions was regarding bundling UMDs with DVDs.
pvong
Sep 14, 02:46 PM
This is her link. I voted.
http://www.evenflo.com/tabid/210/photoType/ViewPhoto/PhotoID/9092/CityID/6/Default.aspx
http://www.evenflo.com/tabid/210/photoType/ViewPhoto/PhotoID/9092/CityID/6/Default.aspx
Shrek
Sep 25, 12:41 PM
Originally posted by jefhatfield
1.25 ghz imac with 17" screen - top of the line
Why not a 1.25GHz iMac with a 19-inch (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2002/09/20020905142426.shtml) screen? :rolleyes:
1.25 ghz imac with 17" screen - top of the line
Why not a 1.25GHz iMac with a 19-inch (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2002/09/20020905142426.shtml) screen? :rolleyes:
Killyp
Sep 11, 01:59 PM
voted again :D
macridah
Oct 24, 10:43 PM
Mos Def. I'm a long distance runner and definitely would like to see this happen.
DeSnousa
May 23, 01:57 AM
MacRumors folding@home has got 3 days before we get overtaken (http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/team_overtake.php?s=&t=3446) . Im new to this but i love the competition and i believe our team could do better so common people and start folding. Try to catch up to me and my powerful iBook :rolleyes:
Here is something to help you get started (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=21908)
Here is something to help you get started (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=21908)
Chaszmyr
Oct 22, 05:35 PM
According to a new PDF file which can be found at mosr Motorolla's current powerpc architecture can eventually take them to 3ghz+ but their current roadmap only takes them to 1ghz with the7455 . We will probably be seeing that chip in the future imacs, and maybe powerbooks too. But they say "G4+" which means they don't have any plans to stop working with apple right away, as G# is a name that Apple gives, not motorolla. But will Apple use them all the way to 3ghz or beyond? If not how slow is moto gonna have to advance to get dropped? I am not seeing a real great processor in Apples future (If they adopt the 970 they might pull ahead eventually, but they will only be equal at the start), but Apple really needs some great product if they want to keep alive.
Balin64
May 19, 05:25 PM
Listen guys: I want to fold and I want to join the team. I have only a P4 PC to offer, but it will fold 24/7, and no one uses it. It should help, no?
Also, if you guys can assure and walk me through it, I will GULP, fold with my iMac G5 at home when it just sits there sleeping. I am away from home about ten hours a day, and use it only about 2-4 hours a night.
I would rather not fold on the iMac... convince me though! The PC at work is ready to go. I also have a Dell tower from 1999 that can fold. Is that one even worth it?
Please advise.
Also, if you guys can assure and walk me through it, I will GULP, fold with my iMac G5 at home when it just sits there sleeping. I am away from home about ten hours a day, and use it only about 2-4 hours a night.
I would rather not fold on the iMac... convince me though! The PC at work is ready to go. I also have a Dell tower from 1999 that can fold. Is that one even worth it?
Please advise.
pcypert
Mar 17, 10:18 PM
The new minis share video duties with the ram so I could see them having problems pushing graphics too hard...
Paul
Paul
fiercetiger224
Mar 22, 09:09 PM
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/775/775292p1.html
Dude, I can't wait! This is actually another title that's "exclusive" to the PS3! I enjoyed the original on the Xbox, and never got Black. So this'll be an awesome investment. Watch the clips in HD...A big WOW. Seriously. 1080p and 60 fps! :D
--EDIT--
The best part: It's coming out on June 26! Is it just me, or is there a really steady flow of great games coming out each month on the PS3?
Dude, I can't wait! This is actually another title that's "exclusive" to the PS3! I enjoyed the original on the Xbox, and never got Black. So this'll be an awesome investment. Watch the clips in HD...A big WOW. Seriously. 1080p and 60 fps! :D
--EDIT--
The best part: It's coming out on June 26! Is it just me, or is there a really steady flow of great games coming out each month on the PS3?
.jpg "PC Wallpapers - Nature")
realityisterror
Jun 2, 01:31 PM
It is back online and see if you can spot the changes.
uhh... not quite...
Digg is down due to metropolitan network issues that took down
several of digg's upstream network providers this morning. The metro
network is being repaired and digg will be back as soon as possible.
Last update: Friday, June 02, 2006 - 8:03AM
uhh... not quite...
Digg is down due to metropolitan network issues that took down
several of digg's upstream network providers this morning. The metro
network is being repaired and digg will be back as soon as possible.
Last update: Friday, June 02, 2006 - 8:03AM
Mudbug
May 22, 11:36 PM
we should all drop everything we're doing and run out and buy all the digital cameras we can find, because they're obviously not going to be made by anyone, anywhere, ever again. ;)
Sun Baked
Mar 23, 07:04 PM
LOL, if you really feel that bad about it my PayPal address is rtdgoldfish@gmail.com. I won't say no. :DYou'd probably only say no if some of the people expected to "borrow" your body for that $5 a pop. ;)
---
Likely somebody that knew you had it and wanted it, hence the targeted break in. :(
And since it seems like a neighbor took it, it shows that they are an idiot.
Time to break out the video camera for evidence.
Edit: if a kid took it, sue the parents if they do not make good on damages and return the merchandise. Should only need that video tape for a small claims case.
---
Likely somebody that knew you had it and wanted it, hence the targeted break in. :(
And since it seems like a neighbor took it, it shows that they are an idiot.
Time to break out the video camera for evidence.
Edit: if a kid took it, sue the parents if they do not make good on damages and return the merchandise. Should only need that video tape for a small claims case.
cubist
Sep 27, 10:45 PM
NEW PRODUCT: eBook
less than 5 lbs; 12 inch screen; G4 667; 16mb vid card; btooth; starts at 999$
This sounds good. I think we might see such a product at MWSF. It would be a CD-ROM only system derived from the iBook. However, for it to be a G4, the G3-based iBooks would have to change, so as to be positioned just slightly upscale.
Note that the current iBooks are using 700MHz IBM G3 (Sahara) processors, which I hear perform much better than their MHz would indicate. My guess is that IBM will make some chip with Altivec that Apple will feel comfortable selling as a G4. This is not going to happen in calendar however.
By mid-2003 we will likely see most of the Apple line transitioning to IBM processors, at a variety of speeds and capabilities.
less than 5 lbs; 12 inch screen; G4 667; 16mb vid card; btooth; starts at 999$
This sounds good. I think we might see such a product at MWSF. It would be a CD-ROM only system derived from the iBook. However, for it to be a G4, the G3-based iBooks would have to change, so as to be positioned just slightly upscale.
Note that the current iBooks are using 700MHz IBM G3 (Sahara) processors, which I hear perform much better than their MHz would indicate. My guess is that IBM will make some chip with Altivec that Apple will feel comfortable selling as a G4. This is not going to happen in calendar however.
By mid-2003 we will likely see most of the Apple line transitioning to IBM processors, at a variety of speeds and capabilities.
MacCoaster
Oct 13, 11:17 PM
Well, I like to listen to music on an MP3 player. Windows does not natively support MP3. I don't like product activation, as it means I have to call and reactivate when I change a bunch of hardware, which I'm likely to do enough for it to be a problem. I don't like paying for an OS with an insecure foundation. I don't like paying for an OS which with IE 'removed' still manages to pop up ads in ... IE. I don't like a dos cli, which has some UNIX commands, but ususally requires DOS commands.
Uh. Windows does have the support. I can play MP3s in Windows Media Player. I can write programs using the API to play MP3s, WMA, ASF, whatever. Maybe you mean to encode? Sure, Microsoft didn't want to pay Fraunhofer for the license, since they have their own audio format that works just fine.
Product activation. Just sends info on computer--no personal info. One click. No big deal. Microsoft is just protecting its profits losses. I've had my Athlon for a year, changed a lot, XP still runs fine and hasn't bitched.
Windows is just as insecure as any desktop OS. I've seen many OS X security updates. Desktop OSes are worst for security if you don't know how to fully utilize the OS security components (i.e. NT Security Model, UNIX security model).
If you want UNIX in Windows. Get cygwin.
.net is an entirely closed initiative. JScript is JavaScript crippled for IE only. C# is (from what I've heard) bad C++. I have tried to avoid .net for many reasons. I enjoy open standards. I like learning languages which are more likely to succeed in the broadest audience. I hate the whole .dll structure. COM/ASP services I have built in the past refused to scale well.
Outside of that, I see nothing wrong with .net, and some people will surely code for it, as long as its around.
Very wrong. Microsoft has a shared-source (other name for open source) .NET VM, compiler, etc. for BSD called ROTOR. It's just as good as the commercial counterpart for Windows, which is free. Hell, ROTOR works on Windows if you want to have ROTOR on Windows. Besides, Mono is GPL'ed open source implementation of Microsoft.NET.
JScript is not only for IE. It's used in scripting. JScript.NET isn't for IE anyways. It's a scripting language that can be compiled into .NET MSIL CLR.
C# is a ECMA standard. Java isn't. It isn't bad C++. It isn't even C++. It's Microsoft's version of SUN's Java with quite some differences from Java. C# isn't Java per se, but very similar. C# is actually a very elegant language. It just works.
Microsoft also encourages standards with XML Web Services. It's an open standard. There's a XML Web Service implementation for Java by SUN. It will play friendly with Microsoft.NET.
COM/ASP scalability is just as bad as PHP scalability. Microsoft.NET solves this with ASP.NET which is far much more powerful and scalable.
No what I'm saying is that Apple is a company that invest heavily in its industrial design, its UI development, etc. which gives it a high degree of style.
No arguments there. Then again, Microsoft has too, especially with Microsoft.NET.
The hardware of Apple's line, love it or hate it, is highly stylized. The OS has a lot more visual appeal, and more thoughful and intuitive layout. It's bloody UNIX my Granny sends me email from. Windows is available as delivered in Marshmellow or 98 Mode. It just looks bad...
Opinionated. I don't care if its bloody UNIX your granny sends emails from, she still doesn't know and therefore doesn't take full advantage of UNIX. Marshmellow? 98 Mode? Microsoft has dumped 9x and moved on with NT/2k/XP.
The ease of use argument is primarily focused opn productivity.
In Windows, when you empty the trash, an alert/confirmation box appears. You can then change focus to another window, burying the alert box, and freezing the OS, so you have to drill down through all the windows you have open to answer this alert before continuing.
Why not simply respond to the request of action immediately then move on. Since when would it freeze the OS? Never happened to me. You don't have to answer to continue. Windows NT/2k/XP uses protected memory, just like Mac OS X. In fact, Windows had it long before Mac OS X even came out the public.
Little annoying counter-intuitive time wasters abound.
Well... I haven't come across anything counter-intuitive or time wasting in XP. It's all opinonated.
I have both, I use both, I code on both, and I just feel from experience that the Mac is a better environment to code on. As I said, I'm not rendering, so the raw speed advantages of x86 are lost to the clunkiness of the UI.
Mac is better vs. PC again. Remember. PC isn't Windows. Besides, the faster speed can help by increasing productivity by making things seem extremely responsive.
My main machine is a DP867 with 2GB of RAM and a ATA133 RAID.
It is as responsive it can be.
Wow, you need that much to be productive under Mac OS X? Jeez.
Well, I run a Dual PIII 500 Server/occasional workstation with 1GB of PC100 Registered ECC Micron RAM, all name brand, unaltered stuff. It also runs only heavily tested commercial apps (no kazaa like crap).
It has a BSOD often enough to cause hair loss. Also, it has very destructive BSODs, meaning I get to use my 4 Win2k boot floppies...that's 3 hours of lost time.
Then you're doing something wrong. Try out Windows XP. Very destructive BSODs, like what? I've only had one about win32k.sys, but that was a memory corruption issue that I quickly solved. Windows XP is absolutely STABLE here.
Uh. Windows does have the support. I can play MP3s in Windows Media Player. I can write programs using the API to play MP3s, WMA, ASF, whatever. Maybe you mean to encode? Sure, Microsoft didn't want to pay Fraunhofer for the license, since they have their own audio format that works just fine.
Product activation. Just sends info on computer--no personal info. One click. No big deal. Microsoft is just protecting its profits losses. I've had my Athlon for a year, changed a lot, XP still runs fine and hasn't bitched.
Windows is just as insecure as any desktop OS. I've seen many OS X security updates. Desktop OSes are worst for security if you don't know how to fully utilize the OS security components (i.e. NT Security Model, UNIX security model).
If you want UNIX in Windows. Get cygwin.
.net is an entirely closed initiative. JScript is JavaScript crippled for IE only. C# is (from what I've heard) bad C++. I have tried to avoid .net for many reasons. I enjoy open standards. I like learning languages which are more likely to succeed in the broadest audience. I hate the whole .dll structure. COM/ASP services I have built in the past refused to scale well.
Outside of that, I see nothing wrong with .net, and some people will surely code for it, as long as its around.
Very wrong. Microsoft has a shared-source (other name for open source) .NET VM, compiler, etc. for BSD called ROTOR. It's just as good as the commercial counterpart for Windows, which is free. Hell, ROTOR works on Windows if you want to have ROTOR on Windows. Besides, Mono is GPL'ed open source implementation of Microsoft.NET.
JScript is not only for IE. It's used in scripting. JScript.NET isn't for IE anyways. It's a scripting language that can be compiled into .NET MSIL CLR.
C# is a ECMA standard. Java isn't. It isn't bad C++. It isn't even C++. It's Microsoft's version of SUN's Java with quite some differences from Java. C# isn't Java per se, but very similar. C# is actually a very elegant language. It just works.
Microsoft also encourages standards with XML Web Services. It's an open standard. There's a XML Web Service implementation for Java by SUN. It will play friendly with Microsoft.NET.
COM/ASP scalability is just as bad as PHP scalability. Microsoft.NET solves this with ASP.NET which is far much more powerful and scalable.
No what I'm saying is that Apple is a company that invest heavily in its industrial design, its UI development, etc. which gives it a high degree of style.
No arguments there. Then again, Microsoft has too, especially with Microsoft.NET.
The hardware of Apple's line, love it or hate it, is highly stylized. The OS has a lot more visual appeal, and more thoughful and intuitive layout. It's bloody UNIX my Granny sends me email from. Windows is available as delivered in Marshmellow or 98 Mode. It just looks bad...
Opinionated. I don't care if its bloody UNIX your granny sends emails from, she still doesn't know and therefore doesn't take full advantage of UNIX. Marshmellow? 98 Mode? Microsoft has dumped 9x and moved on with NT/2k/XP.
The ease of use argument is primarily focused opn productivity.
In Windows, when you empty the trash, an alert/confirmation box appears. You can then change focus to another window, burying the alert box, and freezing the OS, so you have to drill down through all the windows you have open to answer this alert before continuing.
Why not simply respond to the request of action immediately then move on. Since when would it freeze the OS? Never happened to me. You don't have to answer to continue. Windows NT/2k/XP uses protected memory, just like Mac OS X. In fact, Windows had it long before Mac OS X even came out the public.
Little annoying counter-intuitive time wasters abound.
Well... I haven't come across anything counter-intuitive or time wasting in XP. It's all opinonated.
I have both, I use both, I code on both, and I just feel from experience that the Mac is a better environment to code on. As I said, I'm not rendering, so the raw speed advantages of x86 are lost to the clunkiness of the UI.
Mac is better vs. PC again. Remember. PC isn't Windows. Besides, the faster speed can help by increasing productivity by making things seem extremely responsive.
My main machine is a DP867 with 2GB of RAM and a ATA133 RAID.
It is as responsive it can be.
Wow, you need that much to be productive under Mac OS X? Jeez.
Well, I run a Dual PIII 500 Server/occasional workstation with 1GB of PC100 Registered ECC Micron RAM, all name brand, unaltered stuff. It also runs only heavily tested commercial apps (no kazaa like crap).
It has a BSOD often enough to cause hair loss. Also, it has very destructive BSODs, meaning I get to use my 4 Win2k boot floppies...that's 3 hours of lost time.
Then you're doing something wrong. Try out Windows XP. Very destructive BSODs, like what? I've only had one about win32k.sys, but that was a memory corruption issue that I quickly solved. Windows XP is absolutely STABLE here.
island
Jun 2, 12:11 AM
I have to get back up with the SETI crew soon!
dmw007
May 25, 08:54 PM
Just put a Quad and a PB 1.67 online today. I'll do what I can.
The PM has a HUGE protein right now - up to 70 frames.
You will quickly rise to the top with a setup like that iGary! :eek:
Thanks for putting all that computing muscle to work for Team MR! :) :) :)
The PM has a HUGE protein right now - up to 70 frames.
You will quickly rise to the top with a setup like that iGary! :eek:
Thanks for putting all that computing muscle to work for Team MR! :) :) :)
vniow
Aug 29, 03:28 PM
Hey exbox, where'd you get this at? :confused:
Or can you not tell us?
Or can you not tell us?
ddtlm
Oct 5, 06:55 PM
rice_web:
Could you do me a favor and stop reffering to the "7470" as if it is a confirmed device?
Anyway I agree that the G4 has life in it, although IMHO that life should start being in only lower-end machines sometime in 2003. If a 180nm 7-stage G4 can make it 1.5ghz (on the hairy edge), then it is not unreasonable that a few 130nm 7-stage G4's could make it to 2.0ghz, and it is not unreasonable that 90nm 7-stage G4's could go well into the 2.x range.
Could you do me a favor and stop reffering to the "7470" as if it is a confirmed device?
Anyway I agree that the G4 has life in it, although IMHO that life should start being in only lower-end machines sometime in 2003. If a 180nm 7-stage G4 can make it 1.5ghz (on the hairy edge), then it is not unreasonable that a few 130nm 7-stage G4's could make it to 2.0ghz, and it is not unreasonable that 90nm 7-stage G4's could go well into the 2.x range.
Nermal
Apr 7, 03:54 AM
To crack (more so by pass) the activation on a non corparate copy you have to really know what you are doing and that is when you have a guild on how to do it.
It's actually not that difficult. As a moderator I'm supposed to set an example, so I won't go into details, but I've done it myself :)
It's actually not that difficult. As a moderator I'm supposed to set an example, so I won't go into details, but I've done it myself :)